Introduction


Biography

Bibliography
Novels · Sacketts
Short Stories

An Overview

Philosophies

Movie Adaptations

Discussion Forum

Book of the Month

Credits

Purchase the 
Books || Movies

Play Hold 'em right here!

 

 

"I don't travel and tell stories because that's not the way these days, But I write my books to be read aloud and I think of myself in that oral tradition."

----

"If you write a book about a bygone period that lies east of the Mississippi River, then it's a historical novel. If it's west of the Mississippi, it's a western, a different category. There's no sense to it."

~Louis L'Amour

 



Maniacal Writings - by Barry Veinotte
by Barry Veinotte



L'Amour heading

The oral tradition of storytelling taught to him in his youth strongly influenced L'Amour's subject matter and narrative style. His books were written to be read aloud, hence the easy flowing style, great historical detail, and careful portrayal of time and place. The reader is given the detail required to envision the surroundings with little effort, and is given a strong and accurate sense of the environment of the time and place in which the story occurs.

L'Amour's stories, like the epic plots typical of oral literature, are filled with adventure, color, and the age old struggle between good and evil. His heroes, who often narrate the stories in the first person, are usually strong, brave men, who struggle with their conscience and sense of independence as they pursue their quest to settle the West and make permanent homes for themselves. Often the hero, early in the story, will so value their independence and freedom and roaming lifestyle, that when they do settle down near the end of the book, the reader shares the Charles Russell Artworkcharacters emotional conflict. Tyrel Sackett, to name just one, encounters violent weather, hostile Indians, rustlers, and his own conflicting feelings about settling down, and meets and conquers each of these challenges with integrity and honor. L'Amour's heroes do not die in the course of their battles, but are always ready to die, bravely and honorably for that which they believe in. The main characters seldom stand alone; as in the Sackett family, to which L'Amour devoted some seventeen novels, family values run high, and members will quite literally travel across the country to come to the aid of another. The Sackett novels provide a framework for L'Amour's philosophy of civilization. Family loyalty and the complex extended family structures that he created comprise the social, moral, and value systems by which his characters live. Acting contrary to the values defined by the family is considered unacceptable. Lawlessness is defined by the acting in contrast to family values.

While many other Western writers limit their definition of civilization to include only whites, L'Amour deals with a much broader scope. While his Heroes are often white males, they are constantly faced with conflicting feelings about the land of the Indians being overtaken by the white man, and they respect and

admire the native Americans for their strength and lifestyles. At the same time, they believe firmly in white man's destiny to spread his culture throughout the west. One example of this conflict is when Bendigo Shafter, in the L'Amour story of the same name, thinks, "I could have lived the Indian way and loved it ... but other voices were calling me, too, the voices of my own people and their ways."

The Native Americans in L'Amours novels are endowed with the same strong sense of family and Chief - Russell Imagehonor, as they fight to keep their culture amidst the arrival of more and more white men to their land.

Sadly, critical reception of L'Amour's work was often indifferent. Before he gained such popularity that he could no longer be ignored, he was often not reviewed at all. Many critics categorized his novels as "Westerns" and therefor not worthy of critical analysis. L'Amour spoke out about the literary establishment and critics narrow view of genre fiction, saying "If you write a book about a bygone period that lies east of the Mississippi River, then it's a historical novel. If it's west of the Mississippi, it's a western, a different category. There's no sense to it."

Once popularity demanded that he no longer be ignored, critics faulted L'Amour's work for the repetition of characters, his confusing tendency to switch between first and third person narration in the same passage, and in some cases, an overwhelming amount of historical details that detracted from the action of the plot. L'Amour claimed that he never revised his work. there was one draft - the first and final. Some critics felt that his work could have benefited from some revision.

Other critics however, praised L'Amour for his storytelling abilities, memorable characters, complex family structures, and his humorous, evocative narrative technique.

L'Amour never gained a solid critical standing, perhaps in part because of the narrow views that existed in some corners of the literary establishment against the "Western" novel. However his legacy is a huge and valuable chronicle of the American Past, entertaining us with tales filled with history, that will echoed his voice for many, many years to come.

TopUp Arrow

divider

Veinotte.com's Complete Site Wide Directory
Guestbook || Email




This site is a © production of Veinotte.com International Inc.
Contact Webmaster with comments or questions regarding this site

Veinotte.com