|
Introduction
Biography
Bibliography
Novels
· Sacketts
Short
Stories
An Overview
Philosophies
Movie
Adaptations
Discussion
Forum
Book of the Month
Credits
Purchase the
Books || Movies
| "I don't travel and tell stories because that's not the way these
days, But I write my books to be read aloud and I think of myself in that oral
tradition."
----
"If you write
a book about a bygone period that lies east of the Mississippi River, then it's a
historical novel. If it's west of the Mississippi, it's a western, a different category.
There's no sense to it."
~Louis L'Amour
|
by Barry Veinotte
|

The
oral tradition of storytelling taught to him in his youth strongly influenced L'Amour's
subject matter and narrative style. His books were written to be read
aloud, hence the easy flowing style, great historical detail, and careful portrayal of
time and place. The reader is given the detail required to envision the surroundings with
little effort, and is given a strong and accurate sense of the environment of the time and
place in which the story occurs.
L'Amour's stories, like the epic plots typical of oral
literature, are filled with adventure, color, and the age old struggle between good and
evil. His heroes, who often narrate the stories in the first person, are usually strong,
brave men, who struggle with their conscience and sense of independence as they
pursue their quest to settle the West and make permanent homes for themselves. Often the
hero, early in the story, will so value their independence and freedom and roaming
lifestyle, that when they do settle down near the end of the book, the reader shares the
characters emotional conflict. Tyrel Sackett, to name just
one, encounters violent weather, hostile Indians, rustlers, and his own conflicting
feelings about settling down, and meets and conquers each of these challenges with
integrity and honor. L'Amour's heroes do not die in the course of their battles, but are
always ready to die, bravely and honorably for that which they believe in. The main
characters seldom stand alone; as in the Sackett family, to which L'Amour devoted some
seventeen novels, family values run high, and members will quite literally travel across
the country to come to the aid of another. The Sackett novels provide a framework for
L'Amour's philosophy of civilization. Family loyalty and the complex extended family
structures that he created comprise the social, moral, and value systems by which his
characters live. Acting contrary to the values defined by the family is considered
unacceptable. Lawlessness is defined by the acting in contrast to family values.
While many other Western writers limit their definition of
civilization to include only whites, L'Amour deals with a much broader scope. While his
Heroes are often white males, they are constantly faced with conflicting feelings about the land
of the Indians being overtaken by the white man, and they respect and
admire the native
Americans for their strength and lifestyles. At the same time, they believe firmly in
white man's destiny to spread his culture throughout the west. One example of this
conflict is when Bendigo Shafter, in the L'Amour story of the same name, thinks, "I
could have lived the Indian way and loved it ... but other voices were calling me, too,
the voices of my own people and their ways."
The Native Americans in L'Amours novels are endowed with
the same strong sense of family and
honor, as they fight to keep their culture amidst the arrival of more and
more white men to their land.
Sadly, critical reception of L'Amour's work was often indifferent. Before he gained such
popularity that he could no longer be ignored, he was often not reviewed at all. Many
critics categorized his novels as "Westerns" and therefor not worthy of critical
analysis. L'Amour spoke out about the literary establishment and critics narrow view of
genre fiction, saying "If you write a book about a bygone period that lies east of
the Mississippi River, then it's a historical novel. If it's west of the Mississippi, it's
a western, a different category. There's no sense to it."
Once popularity demanded that he no longer be ignored,
critics faulted L'Amour's work for the repetition of characters, his confusing tendency to
switch between first and third person narration in the same passage, and in some cases, an
overwhelming amount of historical details that detracted from the action of the plot.
L'Amour claimed that he never revised his work. there was one draft - the first and final.
Some critics felt that his work could have benefited from some revision.
Other critics however, praised L'Amour for his storytelling
abilities, memorable characters, complex family structures, and his humorous, evocative
narrative technique.
L'Amour never gained a solid critical standing, perhaps in
part because of the narrow views that existed in some corners of the literary
establishment against the "Western" novel. However his legacy is a huge and
valuable chronicle of the American Past, entertaining us with tales filled with history,
that will echoed his voice for many, many years to come.
Top

Veinotte.com's Complete Site Wide Directory
Guestbook || Email
This site is a © production of Veinotte.com
International Inc.
Contact Webmaster with
comments or questions regarding this site
|